Medical Errors Disclosure: Is It Good or Bad?
Authors
Abstract:
Background: In the treatment and health process, there are a lot of dangers to patients, and the increased number of medical errors is one of the most important circumstances of this process. Objective: The present research purposed to decrease medical errors through disclosure of them in hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This qualitative-quantitative study included a population of 232 individuals, selected through targeted non-random selection, who were somehow connected with medical errors made in hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The triangulation technique was utilized to collect data. Data was analyzed using the factor analysis technique. After the effective factors were determined, their internal correlation was determined through regression correlation. Results: Disclosure is made up of organizational culture, the factors related to the patient, the factors related to the presenter, the factors involved in the error, structural factors, and disclosure situation indexes, and is an effective factor in managing the medical errors in hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Disclosure increases the immunity of patients. Conclusion: Disclosure is an effective factor in managing the medical errors that occur at hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. It is essential that managers identify the effective factors in disclosure and take steps to apply a suitable disclosure system to decrease errors.
similar resources
Feedback is good or bad? Medical residents’ points of view on feedback in clinical education
Introduction: Feedback is very important in education and can help quality in the training process and orient the trainees in clinical contexts. This study aimed to assess the residents’ points of view about feedback in clinical education at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.Methods: The sample of this study included 170 medical residents attending medical workshops in Shiraz University of ...
full textThe fructose mystery: how bad or good is it?
This review article endeavoured to ascertain the facts about fructose, a mono-saccharide sugar being increasingly used in daily diet. Human and animal studies suggest that fructose ingestion produces deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system, such as increase in blood pressure and also has adverse metabolic effects, for example insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridaemia. On the other h...
full textCompetition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?
The role of competition in healthcare is much debated. Despite a wealth of international experience in relation to competition, evidence is mixed and contested and the debate about the potential role for competition is often polarised. This paper considers briefly some of the reasons for this, focusing on what is meant by “competition in healthcare” and why it is more valuable to think about th...
full textfeedback is good or bad? medical residents’ points of view on feedback in clinical education
introduction: feedback is very important in education and can help quality in the training process and orient the trainees in clinical contexts. this study aimed to assess the residents’ points of view about feedback in clinical education at shiraz university of medical sciences. methods: the sample of this study included 170 medical residents attending medical workshops in shiraz university of...
full textIs School Segregation Good or Bad?
Fifty years after the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education, racial disparities in achievement are a robust empirical reality. Black children enter kindergarten lagging behind white children, and these differences grow throughout the school years (James S. Coleman et al., 1966; Fryer and Steven D. Levitt, 2004). Even in affluent neighborhoods, achievement gaps are start...
full textNothing either good or bad but action makes it so.
Federico and Perez, in a recent issue of The Journal of Physiology, provide new insight into the impact of incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) on corticospinal preparation for movement (Federico & Perez, 2017). In people with chronic incomplete cervical SCI and age-matched control subjects, they measured motor evoked potentials evoked by cortical (MEPs) or subcortical (CMEPs) stimulation and sh...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 3 issue 1
pages 16- 21
publication date 2018-02-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023